Share |

Articles in "obiter"

An appraisal of the archepiscopate of Dr. Rowan Williams by Tom Sutcliffe, a lay member of the Church of England's General Synod from the Diocese of Southwark for the past 22 years.  Written from an "Affirming Catholicism" perspective, a shorter version of this article appeared in the Spectator.

When I say that I found this Easter message unbelievable, it is because, as I was reading it, I had the sense that Dr. Jefferts Schori's religion is not merely liberal religion, it is a caricature of liberal religion by someone who may not even grasp the extent to which that is true.

It is essential to underscore a governing statement about everything that we have just said: Nothing that distinguishes PEARUSA’s voice is in conflict with the overriding convictions and commitments of ACNA. We do not bring a discordant voice but a complementary, strengthening voice. In fact, everything we believe and practice echoes what many in ACNA already believe and practice. If this were not so, there would not be such enthusiasm from both ACNA and PEARUSA for the development of the protocols to govern PEARUSA as a subjurisdiction of ACNA.

Excuse me, but from my pastoral experience, denial is the worst possible basis for marital reconciliation, and denial is what we are dealing with in a Covenant that involves no repentance and no discipline. A significant number of African Provinces, whom Mr. Kuhrt refers to as “on the extremes” of the Communion, have already written off the Covenant as a Munich-like piece of paper.

The political obituaries of the Archbishop of Canterbury have portrayed Dr. Rowan Williams as a brilliant, decent, spiritual man who was let down by the Church of England, or who was tasked with an impossible job, or who was a unfairly savaged by a rapacious media culture.

The less than glowing statements from overseas church leaders, with a few exceptions such as that of the Archbishop of Cape Town, are treated as outliers, or dismissed with the sentiment that “well, they would say that wouldn’t they.”

There is thus an attitude in the U.K. that there must be something wrong, or at least odd, about those who were not enamored by Dr. Williams. 

"Which one of the Prophets did your fathers not persecute, and they killed the ones who prophesied the coming of the Just One, of whom now, too, you have become betrayers and murderers." (Acts 7:52)

That much having been said, I think it is fair to say that all Christians, everywhere, can uniformly deplore the manner in which this scenario has played out, given the Internet and its ability to spread news at the speed of light, as well as the reactions to that news. The Internet, because of its very immediacy, tends to magnify the significance of individual personalities, and at the same time, to make it thus more difficult to view the entire forest instead of the individual trees (or should I call them "personali-trees"?).

The Archbishop of Canterbury is going to resign next year. At least that’s the story making the rounds of newspapers in London, and the interesting part is not that the 61-year-old Rowan Williams should be willing to give up another decade in the job. Or even, if the Telegraph is right, that the clergy and his fellow bishops are working to push him out.

The AMiA press office appears to have shot itself in the foot once more.  On Dec 9, 2011 – some eleven months after Bishop Alexis Bilindibagabo requested Bishop Chuck Murphy provide an explanation for the discrepancy between the amount of money the AMiA reported as sending to Rwanda as a tithe, and the amount of money received by Rwanda (approximately $1.2 million) – the AMiA released data on the tithe to Rwanda for the years 2004 to 2010.

Given this week's developments in the Anglican Mission in the Americas, that is indeed a question. If Global South Anglicans were ever tempted to think of their western brothers and sisters as "Ugly Americans" this week's resignation of Chuck Murphy & Company from the Anglican Province of Rwanda and the events leading up to it cannot help but reinforce that impression. How will this eventually be resolved? And will this action by AMiA leaders cast a shadow on the Anglican Church in North America's relationship with the Global South? I pray not. But time will tell.

George Conger

 et al.

Confusion over the consequences of the AMiA Bishops walkout has spawned a host of contrary opinions as to what the schism means for the organizations' clergy and congregations.  While the AMiA leadership insists that congregations and clergy are tied to the person of Chuck Murphy, other AMiA leaders have argued the link is with the Province of Rwanda.

Bobby Ross Jr., has written a great story of the Anglican Mission in America (AMiA).  The title of the article at Christianity Today entitled “Leaving Rwanda: Breakaway Anglicans Break Away Again” is rather clever.  It draws upon the imagery of “Out of Africa” as well as offering an amusing play on “breakaway – break away”.

He also takes the story forward, reporting that Bishop Murphy and his faction of the AMiA will seek another Anglican Province to serve as its sponsor.  They're out of Rwanda but hopefully not out of Africa -- and the Anglican Communion